Femoral neuropathy: A clinical and electrodiagnostic review.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Femoral neuropathies can cause severe, prolonged debility, yet there have been few clinical and electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies addressing this condition. The aim of this study was to better understand the etiologies, EDx features, and clinical course of femoral neuropathy. METHODS: We identified patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1, 1999 and July 31, 2019, with possible new femoral neuropathy ascertained via International Classification of Diseases-versions 9 and 10 diagnosis codes presenting within 6 months of symptom onset. RESULTS: A retrospective review of 1084 records was performed and we ultimately identified 159 patients with isolated femoral neuropathy for inclusion. The most common femoral neuropathy etiologies were compressive (40%), perioperative stretch (35%), and inflammatory (6%). Presenting symptoms included weakness (96%), sensory loss (73%), and pain (53%). Presenting motor physical exam findings demonstrated moderate weakness (34%) or no activation (25%) of knee extension and mild (32%) or moderate (35%) weakness of hip flexion. Seventy-two percent of patients underwent EDx testing, including 22 with femoral motor nerve conduction studies. Treatment often involved physical therapy (89%) and was otherwise etiology-specific. In patients with follow-up data available (n = 154), 83% had subjective clinical improvement at follow-up with a mean time to initial improvement of 3.3 months and mean time to recovery at final follow-up of 14.8 months. Only 48% of patients had nearly complete or complete recovery. DISCUSSION: In our cohort, the most common etiologies of femoral neuropathy were compression or perioperative stretch with high initial morbidity. Although motor recovery is common, improvement is often prolonged and incomplete.

Unusual causes for meralgia paresthetica: systematic review of the literature and single center experience.

Meralgia paresthetica is often idiopathic, but sometimes symptoms may be caused by traumatic injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) or compression of this nerve by a mass lesion. In this article the literature is reviewed on unusual causes for meralgia paresthetica, including different types of traumatic injury and compression of the LFCN by mass lesions. In addition, the experience from our center with the surgical treatment of unusual causes of meralgia paresthetica is presented. A PubMed search was performed on unusual causes for meralgia paresthetica. Specific attention was paid to factors that may have predisposed to LFCN injury and clues that may have pointed at a mass lesion. Moreover, our own database on all surgically treated cases of meralgia paresthetica between April 2014 and September 2022 was reviewed to identify unusual causes for meralgia paresthetica. A total of 66 articles was identified that reported results on unusual causes for meralgia paresthetica: 37 on traumatic injuries of the LFCN and 29 on compression of the LFCN by mass lesions. Most frequent cause of traumatic injury in the literature was iatrogenic, including different procedures around the anterior superior iliac spine, intra-abdominal procedures and positioning for surgery. In our own surgical database of 187 cases, there were 14 cases of traumatic LFCN injury and 4 cases in which symptoms were related to a mass lesion. It is important to consider traumatic causes or compression by a mass lesion in patients that present with meralgia paresthetica.

Diagnosis and treatment of meralgia paresthetica between 2005 and 2018: a national cohort study.

The prevalence of meralgia paresthetica (MP), which is caused by compression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), has been increasing over recent decades. Since guidelines and large-scale studies are lacking, there are substantial regional differences in diagnostics and management in MP care. Our study aims to report on current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies as well as time trends in clinical MP management in Germany. Patients hospitalized in Germany between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, with MP as their primary diagnosis were identified using the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) code G57.1 and standardized operations and procedures codes (OPS). A total of 5828 patients with MP were included. The rate of imaging studies increased from 44% in 2005 to 79% in 2018 (p < 0.001) and that of non-imaging diagnostic studies from 70 to 93% (p < 0.001). Among non-imaging diagnostics, the rates of evoked potentials and neurography increased from 20%/16% in 2005 to 36%/23% in 2018 (p < 0.001, respectively). Rates of surgical procedures for MP decreased from 53 to 37% (p < 0.001), while rates of non-surgical procedures increased from 23 to 30% (p < 0.001). The most frequent surgical interventions were decompressive procedures at a mean annual rate of 29% (± 5) throughout the study period, compared to a mean annual rate of 5% (± 2) for nerve transection procedures. Between 2005 and 2018, in-hospital MP care in Germany underwent significant changes. The rates of imaging, evoked potentials, neurography, and non-surgical management increased. The decompression of the LFCN was substantially more frequent than that of the LFCN transection, yet both types of intervention showed a substantial decrease in in-hospital prevalence over time.

Treatment of idiopathic meralgia paresthetica - is there reliable evidence yet?

OBJECTIVE: Meralgia paresthetica is a common condition that is usually diagnosed by its classical clinical presentation and by exclusion of a spinal origin of pain, sensory loss, and/or paresthesias in the anterolateral thigh. Treatment modalities include conservative management, local injections, and surgical therapy. To date, no level 1 evidence exists about treatment options for idiopathic meralgia paresthetica. This review article aims to give a structured overview of epidemiology, history, anatomy, diagnostics, and treatment. It focuses on the existing literature and current developments in clinical management. METHODS: A literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE was performed on 20 December 2021, yielding 1412 results. Abstracts were screened and classified in terms of epidemiology, anatomy, diagnostics, and treatment. RESULTS: High-quality observational data that was included in recent meta-analyses showed satisfactory results for conservative management, injections, and surgical decompression or neurectomy, but there is some major methodological criticism. For idiopathic meralgia paresthetica, the results of surgical decompression have never been compared to those of neurectomy in a randomized setup. The only study protocol published so far does not consider any extended decompression techniques (dynamic, circumferent, proximal, and distal to the inguinal ligament). A multicenter, prospective design has never been proposed. DISCUSSION: Reliable high-quality evidence on the treatment of idiopathic meralgia paresthetica is lacking at the current state, and challenges in clinical decision-making remain.

Estimulación medular como tratamiento de la meralgia parestésica. ¿Es factible? Reporte de caso / Spinal cord stimulation to treat meralgia paresthetica. Is it feasible? A case report

La meralgia parestésica es un desorden neurológico causado por una neuropatía del nervio femorocutáneo lateral. Su etiología puede ser idiopática o iatrogénica. Se caracteriza por dolor, parestesias y entumecimiento en la cara anterolateral del muslo. Su diagnóstico es básicamente clínico, aunque pueden ser útiles pruebas de imagen o neurofisiológicas. A pesar de que el tratamiento conservador suele ser eficaz en la mayoría de los pacientes, existen casos refractarios que pueden precisar de otras formas de tratamiento. Los procedimientos quirúrgicos disponibles son la descompresión nerviosa (neurólisis) o la sección (neurectomía) y las ablaciones por radiofrecuencia. Presentamos un caso de meralgia parestésica invalidante refractaria en el cual empleamos la estimulación medular como posible técnica eficaz en el alivio del dolor y poder evitar la realización de una neurectomía del nervio femorocutáneo lateral (AU)

Meralgia paresthetica is a neurological disorder caused by a neuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Its etiology can be spontaneous or iatrogenic. It is characterized by pain, paresthesia, and numbness in the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. Diagnosis is based on clinical examination, although image and neurophysiological tests can be useful as well. Despite conservative measures use to be effective in most of patients, refractory cases can benefit from alternative treatments. Available surgical procedures are: nerve decompression (neurolysis) or section (neurectomy) and radiofrequency ablation. We present a case of refractory meralgia paresthetica where spinal cord stimulation was used as a possible effective technique in pain relief and to avoid the neurectomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (AU)

[Decompression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh : Treatment of meralgia paresthetica]. / Operative Dekompression des Nervus cutaneus femoris lateralis : Behandlung der Meralgia paraesthetica.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of non-responding pain to conservative treatment located at the anterolateral thigh with surgical decompression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve of the thigh (LFCN). INDICATIONS: Compression syndrome of the LFCN; patients suffering from the following symptoms: pain (dysesthesia), numbness (paresthesia), hypersensibility to temperature (or temperature changes) along the course of the LFCN located at the anterolateral thigh. CONTRAINDICATIONS: A new or recrudescent hernia with additional pain or recent laparoscopic hernia repair as a supposed iatrogenically induced compression of the LFCN. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Dissection and release of the LFCN of connective tissue, scar tissue, bone rims, and retraction located along the passage underneath the inguinal ligament and distally. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Suture removal after 10-14 days, no sports for 2 weeks. Physiotherapy if necessary. Neurography 4 months after surgery (obligatory if symptoms are persistent). The patient should be followed up for about 24 months. RESULTS: Of the patients, 69% had a history of trauma or surgery, which were designated as the onset of pain. Of these patients, 78% had hip prostheses and 22% had previous falls. Postoperatively, a significant reduction of pain of 6.6 points on the numeric rating scale was observed. All other evaluated parameters also improved postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was high, with 86% reporting complete satisfaction, and 14% reporting partial satisfaction.

Spontaneous iliacus haematoma with femoral nerve palsy: an appeal to involve surgical teams early.

We report the case of a 68-year-old man who was placed on heparin as bridge therapy and subsequently developed an iliacus haematoma with associated femoral nerve palsy. His team involved the orthopaedic surgery team in delayed fashion after his symptom onset. Due to his active medical conditions, he did not undergo surgical decompression of his haematoma until late into his hospital course. Unfortunately, this patient did not regain meaningful function from his femoral nerve deficit. We believe this case highlights the high index of suspicion necessary for making this diagnosis as well as the repercussions of an untimely decompression for this acute, compressive neuropathy. Although we are surgeons and this is a surgical case, we hope to publish this case in a medical journal to raise awareness that surgical decompression does have a role in this diagnosis and should ultimately be pursued early in its course for optimal patient benefit.

Severe Postpartum Femoral Neuropathy: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neuropathy is a rare complication of vaginal delivery that is often under-reported. It is marked by weakness and sensory loss in the lower limbs. This report presents 3 cases to outline possible prevention strategies, as well as to describe the process of diagnosis, management, and recovery for this injury. CASES: Diagnosis is made clinically, and prognosis is determined by clinical follow-up along with nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Management involves interdisciplinary efforts with physiotherapy. Prevention includes frequent repositioning and avoidance of hip hyperflexion during labour. The expected recovery period ranges from 2 to 24 months. CONCLUSION: Femoral neuropathy after vaginal delivery is under-reported. Though prognosis is often excellent, special attention to positioning during labour, prompt clinical diagnosis, and interdisciplinary management are essential for this rare injury.

Extended pulsed radiofrequency as a part of multimodal pain management in a refractory case of Bernhardt-Roth syndrome.

Bernhardt-Roth syndrome (BRS) is a neurological condition characterised by pain, burning or numbness in anterolateral thigh due to entrapment of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN). The possible aetiologies can be mechanical, iatrogenic, neuropathic or idiopathic. After consent for possible publication, we are discussing a case of pain management in a 38-year-old patient with BRS secondary to diabetes. The coherent history, uncontrolled glycaemic status and reduced nerve conduction velocity for LFCN helped reach the diagnosis. Initial treatment with pharmacotherapy, steroid LFCN block and conventional pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) provided moderate temporary pain relief. Extended PRF over 8 min provided significant analgesia without any complications. Physical therapy, adequate glycaemic control and extended PRF provided complete pain relief and improved function over 6 months of follow-up duration. Hence, a cautious multifaceted approach targeting the basic aetiology with extended PRF helped achieve significant analgesia in our refractory case of BRS.

Femoral neuropathy following venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Although life-threatening complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are well described, non-life threatening complications are less known. Herein, we report a case of femoral neuropathy (FN) due to nerve compression caused by cannula compression and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after successful ECMO therapy, which seriously undermined one's quality of life. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year old male presented to the emergency department for chest pain. The patient had cardiac arrest before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and was inserted with ECMO. Although he was successfully weaned from ECMO 4 days after PCI, he consistently complained swelling, abnormal sensation, and weakness in his right lower extremity, where the cannulas were inserted. Imaging studies showed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in his right leg, which was further treated with anticoagulants. Symptoms, however, remained after the regression of DVT. Nerve conduction study revealed femoral neuropathy, which may have been caused by ECMO cannula compression and tissue swelling. CONCLUSION: The current case proposes that non-life threatening complications of ECMO therapy can seriously affect quality of life. Venous drainage distant from the arterial cannula may prevent such complications.

Meralgia paresthetica: Nerve stimulator-guided injection with methylprednisolone/lidocaine, a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Meralgia paresthetica is a mononeuropathy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. A common therapy is injection with corticosteroids. The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of injection with methylprednisolone/lidocaine vs placebo. METHODS: After randomization, 10 patients received a nerve stimulator-guided injection with methylprednisolone/lidocaine, and 10 patients received saline. The primary outcome measure was pain (visual analogue scale, VAS). RESULTS: In the placebo group, there was a significant pain reduction (baseline VAS, 6.8; VAS week 12, 4.3; P = .014). The VAS score in the methylprednisolone group did not show a significant reduction (baseline VAS, 7.4; VAS week 12, 4.8; P = .053). There was no significant difference in pain reduction between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found no objective evidence for benefit from nerve stimulator-guided injection with corticosteroids in meralgia paresthetica, although this study is limited by a small sample size. Future placebo-controlled studies using ultrasound-guided injection are warranted.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Meralgia Paresthetica in Pregnancy.

IMPORTANCE: Carpal tunnel syndrome and meralgia paresthetica are 2 common neuropathies complicating pregnancy. Each of these causes significant discomfort but can be diagnosed and treated safely during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This article outlines the existing literature diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and meralgia paresthetica, specifically looking at the implications during pregnancy. The aim is to provide a reference for physicians diagnosing and treating neuropathies in pregnant patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Existing literature on neuropathies during pregnancy, clinical presentation, and treatment options for both carpal tunnel syndrome and meralgia paresthetica was reviewed through a MEDLINE and PubMed search. Referenced articles were reviewed and used as primary source materials as appropriate. RESULTS: Carpal tunnel syndrome affects individuals of all ages and sexes but is more prevalent in women, particularly during pregnancy. Meralgia paresthetica can occur in various circumstances but is most commonly associated with prolonged second stage in lithotomy position. Multiple clinical signs and neurologic tests are useful to establish the diagnosis of either neuropathy. Effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome includes wrist splints, steroid and lidocaine injections, and release surgery. Optimal treatment of meralgia paresthetica remains controversial but includes nerve block injections and active release techniques. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Neuropathies are common in pregnancy and can result in significant impairment. Accurate diagnosis is possible during pregnancy and can usually be accomplished with bedside neurologic tests. Treatment options can be safely considered during pregnancy and can result in symptomatic improvement and reduction in chronic symptoms.

Meralgia paresthetica: finding an effective cure.

Meralgia Paresthetica (MP) is one of the most common mononeuropathies of the lower limb. MP usually resolves on its own, even without treatment. However, many physicians are not aware of this diagnosis and may confuse patients with another nerve disease such as radiculopathies. Although no motor symptoms are associated with this condition, the sensory dysfunctions are potentially debilitating to patients. The variable course of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve also complicates treatments. Thus, the author recommends the use of ultrasonography to help locate the nerve. Many treatments for MP are available, but they are supported only by moderate to low-quality evidence. Treatments range from conservative to interventions using nerve blocks and surgery. Without a clear superiority of any treatment, the author concludes that treatment should be done in a stepwise fashion, from the noninvasive to the more invasive treatment if symptoms persist.

[Femoral neuropathy: Haematoma in iliac muscle and a lumbar vertebral fracture]. / Neuropatía femoral: hematoma en músculo ilíaco y fractura vertebral lumbar.

75-year-old patient with a history of acenocumarol anticoagulated atrial fibrillation, which shows pain, functional impotence and right lower limb paresthesias after fall. Studies evidenc evertebral fracture L5 and haematoma on right iliac muscle, proceeding to surgical drainage, suspension of acenocumarol, and onset of apixaban. After treatment persisted femoral neuropathy, which not allowed complete functional recovery. DISCUSSION: Femoral neuropathy as possible cause of compressive hematoma over iliopsoas muscle or secundary to lumbar canal stenosis and contact with L4 root. In both of the misit posible to observe weakness of proximal lower limb musculature. Haematoma was suspected due to lower back pain, flank mass and hypovolemia. Handlingis based on the severity of the symptomatology, from conservative to surgical drainage to reduce sequelae and bleeding complications. Apixaban has shown a higher safety profile. Stabilization of lumbar fracture allowed partial functional recovery.

Inguinal segmental nerve conduction of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in healthy controls and in patients with meralgia paresthetica.

A common entrapment site of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) is in the vicinity of the inguinal ligament. However the more distal segment of this nerve can also be affected. Electrophysiological evaluation of this nerve is difficult. Additionally, available methods have failed in the lesion localization of LFCN. In this study, we aimed to evaluate nerve conduction study in different segments of the LFCN. Nerve action potentials of the LFCN were recorded with distal surface electrodes from a relatively distant point (about 30 cm caudal to the spina iliaca anterior superior). An electrical stimulus was given both 10 cm distal to the SIAS and at the level of the SIAS. Inguinal segmental and distal sensory nerve conduction studies were performed on the LFCN. Thirty-eight healthy controls and 34 patients with meralgia paresthetica (MP) were analyzed by this method. All patients with MP showed electrophysiological abnormalities. Slowed sensory conduction on the inguinal channel (p:0.0001) and loss of response were the most frequent abnormalities (44.7% and 31.6%). In one patient, the only abnormality was slowed sensory conduction at the distal site. Our findings suggest that this technique can help in diagnosis and lesion localization in MP.